![]() |
Or on Fox News:
The Chicago Tribune and the other news outlets are speculating that Malaysian authorities believe, and yes they said "believe" that the plane's crew, or a passenger on the plane deliberately diverted it. Again with just the speculations. No real facts. All of these "believes" and "could haves" are not real, cold, hard facts, which is what should be reported on. The truth is, there are no facts to really report right now regarding the dissapearance, because no one really seems to know what the hell happened to the plane. Instead of reporting on events and stories that they have real facts about, the media continually reports these speculations and theories about what happened. Why? Because this is what the American people want to hear and read about. The average American doesn't want to here about the doom and gloom of what is really going on in the rest of the world and the problems we as a global community are facing when it comes to these problems in the Middle East and Asia for example.
The disappearance of this plane is basically soft news. Human interest about all of the missing passengers. And as we learned about in class, people in America love soft news. We love reading about the kitten who can skateboard or the dog that can juggle. Media companies increase soft and generic news because of the danger of being an outlier. What if one of these four news agencies had a very different story on its front page regarding Iran's achievement of nuclear power, for example. Would people read that or would they switch to another news source that was reporting about the airplane? It seems that the media thinks they would switch, and that is why they are all reporting on precisely the same story, and the same speculations.This type of behavior from the media is exactly like what we learned about. It's the Market Model of journalists serving the public whatever the public demands. And the public definitely seems to be demanding to hear speculations about what happened to the Malaysia Airlines plane because that is all we have been getting from the media in the past week.




Great post! Possibly discuss an alternative to how the media can move away from soft news and maintain ratings?
ReplyDeleteI thought that your choice to write about the missing airplane was a great choice for this project. While I do disagree about the missing plane being soft news, I think you did a pretty good job of making a point that news outlets have used this to put other significant problems out of the spotlight. One thing you could use to strengthen your article is look up the search hits for "missing airplane" to that of "Russia invading Ukraine" or something similar. I can imagine that far more people are interested in the missing airplane because of the media.
ReplyDeleteI really like the use of the front pages of those websites as a source for your arguments. While there are reasons why these sources are covering the plane disappearance, I do agree that the annexation of Crimea definitely deserves more attention. I do think, however, you could give some of your speculation on why the news seems to be more directed towards the airplane, rather than these other developing stories.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very strong post, in which you did a good job of connecting course concepts to something currently unfolding in the news, while also providing your own original commentary on the topic. The visuals you provided are also well done. You will want to read through this again and fix some of the typos and grammatical issues. Potentially now with some time there have also been some assessments of how much of the mainstream media's overall coverage was devoted to this story? There has been a substantial amount of criticism of this now and perhaps that could help strengthen your argument even further.
ReplyDelete